Alliances militaires en Europe : OTAN (1949) et Pacte de Varsovie (1955)
Copyright © CC BY-SA 3.0
La Guerre froide
Kennedy fait publiquement état de son hostilité au développement d'une force de dissuasion nucléaire indépendante par la France
Mr. President, Secretary Rusk has just about completed his rounds of the Western European capitals. I wonder if you can give us an evaluation of his trip, with particular reference to whether this Government has now accepted France's determination to build its own nuclear power, and whether we will seek to coordinate and integrate that power into the NATO system?
We have always accepted its determination to do so. What we have not agreed to is to participate in the development of a national deterrent. We believe that is inimical to the community interest of the Atlantic Alliance, that it encourages other countries to do the same.
Now, France has determined to do so, she is going to do it. But I think that for the United States to associate with that effort, to associate with the concept of additional independent national nuclear deterrents, to play our part in its development, would be a mistake, both from the point of view of the United States, of the Atlantic Community, and of peace, because other countries will be compelled to do the same. And in my judgment, the NATO Alliance and the steps we have taken to implement the NATO Alliance give adequate security to Europe and the United States. I think we should stay with that. Now, the French do not agree, and they are going ahead. We accept that. But we do not agree with it.
Crise de Berlin 1958 - 1963
Stratégie militaire des États européens
Conférence de Presse de Kennedy du 27 juin 1962 (Question 9)
Une politique étrangère 1958-1969
Chap. III Les États-Unis, D. Eisenhower et J. Kennedy
Page : 89 - 119
• Design et développement
© 2019 - 2022 • v1.2.1/k/8.0.23/pdo • Page générée en 0.146 s